Thursday, October 4, 2012

Media exposes South Africa's false image.




south africa image(www.google.com)
"South Africa's coat of arms, or state emblem, South African flower, representing harmony of the country


My attention was drawn by the Public relations practitioner in the Mail and guardian who sais  in South Africa"you can  never over-communicate in a crisis", but,
as a country that is  democratic  and creates an image of poor service delivery what South Africa stands for as a "harmony country" is false.

 South Africans seem to be  constantly rising to the streets  and  the Marikanna strike is just an example of how the government  fails to meet public demands.

As a Public relations practitioner who strives to maintain a favourable image for the country of South Africa, I still believe that the media constantly communicates about the negative image of South Africa.

 

unhappy strikers(www.google.com)
Lets look at service delivery in our country:since 2004  media reports express how South Africa has experienced poor  service delivery issues. South Africans are forever on strike, promises by the government such as that of
 Article 6  of workers rightsexpresses that

11) There shall be equal pay for work of equal value, and equal access to employment, training and advancement is mere talk
 issues such as poverty, unemployment and equality seem to be unchanging.

Democracy in our country as according to the media  means no exclusion,  no segregation and no  oppression of the majority. So why is it that  South Africans are oppressed and killed when they communicate about issues? 
The questions South Africans should answer  are:
  1.  Is the media working for or against the image of South Africa?
  2. is the  R12 500 that mine workers are requesting realistic?. 

8 comments:

  1. All I know is that as South Africans we love to strike but we don't think of the consequences and when things don't go our way, we blame unions and the government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @kea Rams after seeing 34 people dead I definetly agree with you South Africans love to strike.We do think of the consequences but we strike any way. We are very quick to blame unions more especially when we do not get what we want.

      Delete
  2. According to my personal point of view,Government do not think for other people,they only think for themselves.Miners deserve that R12.500,even more.Just imagine the loss that South Africa would experience without them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to a release on monday on news 24 it was revealed that about 37% of black taxpayers, 68% of whites, 63% of coloureds and 69% of Indians felt the money was not being spent well. I als o think that Government only thinks for itself.

      Delete
  3. On the other hand we should also blame employers who think of themseleves and forget the people who are doing dirty work for them people who sacricfies thetir family times to work.Thern at the end some employers do not recognise thier hard work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I believe that the employers also have a responsibility to their employess to ensure that the needs of employers are met.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Quick question; "Do you believe that a garden worker should be paid the same salary as a manging director?" The trick here is that South Africa is aiming at being on par with its international counter parts and by doing so it needs to change its ways into being a capitalist nation with a false pretence of putting the nation's intersts first. I understand the workers demands as they are working one of the most dangereous jobs in the world, but you can not expect to be paid the same alary as someone who went to school for a qualification while you do not have a qualification...@MokD21

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I do not believe that a garden worker should be paid the same salary as a managing director, but I do believe that the Mineworkers should be given a raise in their salaries.

      Delete